CURRENT ISSUE :: 29 FEBRUARY 2024 :: VOLUME 41 :: ISSUE 3

 IJCMAAS PEER REVIEW PROCESS



  • International Journal of Current Medical And Applied Sciences [IJCMAAS] follows standard procedure for review process of manuscripts. Manuscripts are peer reviewed following the procedure outlined below.
  • Initial assessment of manuscript:-

  • The initial assessment will be done by one of the editors of IJCMAAS, editor first evaluates submitted manuscript. A manuscript which is according to guidelines of IJCMAAS, then it is to be accepted at this stage and send for further process of review. Manuscripts are rejected at this stage i.e serious scientific flaws, poor grammar, outside the aims and scope of the journal. Authors of manuscripts rejected at this stage will be informed within two days receipt.
  • Blinding process of Journal:-

  • IJCMAAS peer review journal follows double blind review process for reviewing the article i.e. Our both the reviewers blind for identity of the authors and Author also blind for reviewer details.
  • Reviewers Reports:-

  • Reviewers of IJCMAAS is providing Standard review report format and Manuscript.
    Reviewers are asked to evaluate whether the manuscript:
    • 1. Originality of manuscript.
    • 2. Methodology of manuscript.
    • 3. Follows ethical guidelines.
    • 4. Clarity of Observations & Results supporting to conclusion.
    • 5. References according to guidelines and previous relevant work.
    • 6. Plagiarism in article.
    • 7. Usefulness/ Applicability of manuscript.

  • Reviewers of manuscript will send review report of Manuscript in standard proforma of IJCMAAS. In the final process, the handling Editor will check reviewers report and will prepared final report. When it is extremely difficult to find a second reviewer to review the manuscript, at the same time as the one referee’s report has received then handling Editor prepared final review report. The handling Editor, a decision to accept, reject or ask the author for a revision may be made, at the handling Editor’s discretion, on the basis of only one referee report. The handling Editor’s decision will be sent to the author with the reviewer recommendations. As a rule, revised manuscripts are sent to the initial referees for checking; these may then request further revision.

Final Decision:-

A final decision to accept or reject the manuscript will be sent to the author along with the recommendations made by the reviewer/referees. Chief Editor may take final decision regarding acceptance or rejection of manuscript.